Lichess Feedback - Suggestion - sorting of your favourite studies#3 You could create a blog post and link to the studies in that post. | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Bug: Sharing studies in the analysis board is impossible#3 I'm talking about the analysis board chat, not study chats. | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Bug: Sharing studies in the analysis board is impossible#1 Hello, I've encountered a very weird bug: When I post a link to a study in the game analysis chat, the link doesn't show up. I tried that on several chats, and it's always reproducable. I know for a f… | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - analysis unter 20 in many games#5 It's *average* centipawn loss. Meaning when someone is dragging out a lost position, then the opponent will be better for many moves, lowering the average. That number doesn't say much. More important… | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - No king study#4 You can just create a study, and use the board editor for each chapter. That does allow you to create positions without kings. I just tested it. | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Ability to change font in lichess study.#7 Again, the age of the device doesn't matter. You can get the same result with a computer you bought today. | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Ability to change font in lichess study.#5 My installed fonts cover pretty much all available unicode code points. But the browser (Chromium) doesn't find them. And that will happen on many systems. Age is not the issue. | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Ability to change font in lichess study.#3 @Diwaditya What you are using is called "glyphs", not fonts. Their representation depends entirely on the font available on the user's system. And if the currently used font doesn't contain these glyp… | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Missing lines in Stockfish analysis#1 This happens a lot, especially with king moves: Instead of 3 lines as per my setting, I get only one. I'd like to know how bad the alternatives are, but no matter what I try, I get just that one line.… | fuxia |
Lichess Feedback - Creating a set of studies#2 Create a new "meta" study. Use the notation for links to your other studies. That's basically the only way, because study tags for one single person don't have a public URL. Here is an example: https:… | fuxia |
Next |
---|